- Published on
Nested Radicals and a Cosine Formula
- Authors

- Name
- Vu Hung
Problem Statement
The numbers , for integers , are defined as:
These numbers satisfy the relation , for . (Do NOT prove this.)
Use mathematical induction to prove that for all integers .
Hints
Attempt the proof independently first. Focus on the key theorem, algebraic transformation, or contradiction setup that links the hypothesis to the target conclusion.
Solutions
Proof by Mathematical Induction
Base Case ():
LHS: (given)
RHS:
Since LHS = RHS, the statement holds for . \checkmark
Inductive Hypothesis:
Assume the statement is true for , where is a positive integer:
Inductive Step:
We must prove the statement for :
Using the recurrence relation and the inductive hypothesis:
Apply the double angle identity: .
Let , so :
Taking square roots:
Since , we have , so .
Also, is defined as nested square roots of positive numbers, so .
Therefore:
This completes the inductive step. \checkmark
Conclusion:
By mathematical induction, for all integers .
\hfill
Takeaways
- Induction with Recurrence: Use given recurrence relation in inductive step to relate to
- Double Angle Formula: Identity is key to converting sum to square
- Sign Consideration: Must justify taking positive square root using domain/range analysis
- Angle Halving: Pattern shows relates to of successively halved angles ()
Further Readings
If you found this proof interesting, be sure to check out these relevant HSC booklets to sharpen your reasoning skills:
- HSC Proofs: https://vumaths.com/booklets/hsc-proofs/
- HSC Polynomials: https://vumaths.com/booklets/hsc-polynomials/
- HSC Probability: https://vumaths.com/booklets/hsc-probability/
Connect with me
If you're eager for more HSC Maths insights, be sure to check out my Substack. For deeper dives and regular tips, join my Website - Vu's Maths Hub. Let's tackle these challenging math problems together! You can also catch my daily math content on GitHub.
